The Safety and PPE Industry’s Largest Online Network

Sign Up here to receive free resources including the latest jobs, invitations to events and access to webinars, whitepapers and eBooks

Job
Board

Create a Job Seeker account and apply for jobs. If you are a Recruiter advertise your jobs for FREE

Sign up to our
monthly e-magazines

including Salus, The PPE Safety Showcase and SafeTech

Promote your
Business with Us

Find out about our marketing and advertising solutions

News

Recent studies have found that tampons, which millions of people use every month, contain toxic metals like lead, arsenic, and cadmium. 

This research, done by UC Berkeley and Columbia University, is the first of its kind to measure these metals in tampons. 

And it’s a big deal! The vaginal skin can absorb these harmful substances quickly, raising significant health concerns.

What They Found

  • Researchers tested tampons from 14 different brands and found 16 metals, including some toxic ones. 
  • Non-organic tampons had more lead, while organic tampons showed higher levels of arsenic. 
  • These metals likely come from contaminated water, air, soil, and the manufacturing process. (Berkeley Public Health) (Mailman School).

The Risks

Exposure to toxic metals can lead to serious health issues like dementia, infertility, diabetes, cancer, and damage to the liver, kidneys, brain, heart, nervous system, and hormones. It can also affect maternal health and fatal development.  (Berkeley Public Health) (Mailman School).

A Personal Encounter with TSS

As someone with a deep and personal connection to menstrual health, I have always advocated for alternatives like menstrual cups and period pants. My mother’s near-fatal encounter with Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) in the late 1980s, due to a tampon being left in too long, left a lasting impression on me.

TSS is a rare but serious bacterial infection often linked to tampon use. After a week of battling a severe bug, she had forgotten she had a tampon in during her period. This oversight led to a staphylococcus infection that ravaged her body. She endured a coma, multiple surgeries, kidney failure, and cardiac arrests.

This traumatic event underscored the hidden dangers of tampons and the importance of raising awareness about safer menstrual products. The symptoms of TSS, such as rash, fever, nausea, and confusion, can easily be mistaken for other illnesses, making it even more dangerous and difficult to detect.

Why I Advocate for Moon Cups and Period Pants

Given my personal history, I have long been an advocate for Moon cups and period pants. These products offer a safer alternative to tampons, reducing the risk of TSS and exposure to potentially harmful substances.

  • Moon Cups: These reusable silicone cups collect menstrual blood without causing microscopic tears in the vaginal walls. They are cost-effective, environmentally friendly, and significantly reduce the risk of infections.
  • Period Pants: These are brilliant inventions designed to absorb menstrual flow comfortably and discreetly. They offer a chemical-free, convenient option that supports menstrual health without the risks associated with tampons.

The Call for Greater Awareness and Inclusivity

Given the recent studies on toxic metals in tampons, it’s crucial to consider safer alternatives and promote menstrual health education. By sharing these findings, my mother’s story and advocating for menstrual cups and period pants, I hope to encourage others to explore these options and prioritise their health.

We need to keep talking about the risks associated with traditional menstrual products and push for safer, more inclusive solutions. There has never been a more important time to break the silence and stigma around menstrual health and make sure everyone has access to safe and effective menstrual care.

It’s vital for manufacturers to test and label menstrual products for toxic metals. Increased public awareness and demand for safer products can drive industry changes, ensuring menstrual health products are safe for all users.

This is why I am driven to change the conversation about being in a body that bleeds. So we can have open conversations and feel comfortable sharing our stories.

Menstrual education is crucial at all levels of our development, and that’s where I come in. I bring the ‘missing education’ we never got in school to organisations and give them the tools to navigate and normalise conversations with empathy rather than embarrassment.

Find out more about Bloody Marvellous Menstrual Workshops here.

For more information on the study and its implications, you can refer to the full articles here (Berkeley Public Health) (Mailman School).

Or if you have any questions about the work I do or want support, please reach out at rise@samanthagarstin.com

In September we are publishing an e-magazine focusing on food safety and hygiene. Our digital publications go into the email inbox of over 150,000 HSE and PPE professionals and are also promoted online to 500,000 of our members. This is an excellent opportunity to promote a new update, launch a product or simply increase your brand awareness.

This edition will include –🌡 Food handling and storage
🌡 Training and education
🌡 The latest software
🌡 Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
🌡 Risk assessment and hazard control

Features started from just £550 and include extensive promotion and marketing as well as a 12-month listing on www.theppeandsafetydirectory.com.

Please get in touch if you would like to find out more – info@hsepeople.com

Scientists from the University of California, Berkeley have discovered toxic metals in tampons, which could pose serious health risks to women.

In their study, the researchers analysed 30 tampons from 14 different brands, finding all 16 metals they tested for in each sample. These metals included arsenic, lead, mercury, nickel, copper, and iron, among others.

The levels of metals varied based on whether the tampons were sold in the US, UK, or EU, whether they were organic or non-organic, and whether they were branded or generic supermarket lines.

The study highlights that between 52% and 86% of women in the US use tampons during their menstrual cycles.

Due to their direct contact with the vaginal area, tampons contaminated with harmful substances pose significant health risks, as the metals can be easily absorbed.

Exposure to these metals can increase the risk of conditions such as dementia, cancer, infertility, and diabetes, and can affect the liver, kidneys, brain, as well as the cardiovascular, nervous, and endocrine systems. They can also be harmful to unborn babies.

Jenni Shearston, the lead author of the study, noted: “Despite the significant potential for public health concerns, very little research has been done to measure chemicals in tampons. To our knowledge, this is the first study to measure metals in tampons. Alarmingly, we found concentrations of all metals we tested for, including toxic metals like arsenic and lead.”

No Safe Level of Metal

The study found that organic tampons had higher levels of arsenic, while non-organic tampons had more lead. Metals can contaminate tampons through the absorption of polluted water, air, or soil by the cotton, or through the intentional addition by manufacturers for pigmentation.

The researchers stressed that there is no “safe” level of any of the metals tested.

Ms. Shearston expressed hope that manufacturers will be required to test their products for metals, particularly toxic ones. “It would be encouraging to see the public demand this, or call for better labelling on tampons and other menstrual products,” she added.

Video footage of perilous incidents at level crossings has been released as part of a summer safety campaign.

In June, a girl was caught on camera running across a crossing in Fishbourne, West Sussex, just a couple of metres ahead of an oncoming train.

Recent CCTV footage also captured people hanging from rising crossing barriers in Chertsey, Surrey; rushing cyclists colliding in Hounslow, London; and a car swerving to avoid closing barriers in Bramley, Hampshire.

Network Rail, which released the video, stated that July is a peak time for such incidents.

Sam Pead, a regional level crossing manager, said: “It’s frustrating we continue to see people recklessly risking their lives when crossing the railway.

“Across the Southern region, trains can travel as fast as 140mph (225km/h) and are largely powered by the third rail, which carries more than enough electricity to kill or seriously injure and is always on.”

Farnham in Surrey and Star Lane in Wokingham, Berkshire, were the most misused level crossings in the Wessex region last year, according to Network Rail.

The footage from Hounslow showed cyclists colliding as they hurried to avoid the barriers, highlighting the dangers of rushing through level crossings.

Addlestone and Ash in Surrey and Poole High Street in Dorset also recorded more than one incident per month.

In Chertsey, CCTV captured a lorry tearing off a barrier as the driver attempted to escape the tracks.

Network Rail noted that incidents involving poorly trained or uncontrolled dogs have become more common post-Covid.

Clappers Lane in Ferring, West Sussex, recorded near misses involving a dog walker and a cyclist. At Ashtead Common, Surrey, a dog walker ignored a stop sign, and a dog was filmed waiting alone on the track at the same location.

Network Rail reported 28 near misses in the Wessex region during the 2023-24 financial year, which is 13% fewer than the previous year. However, incidents of level crossing misuse in the region rose by 24% to 466.

Find out more about the campaign on the Network Rail website.

Loneworker apps are widely recognised for enhancing the safety and security of lone workers by providing essential features such as GPS tracking, panic buttons, automated check-ins, and emergency alerts. They cater to various industries and help ensure compliance with safety standards and regulations.

According to an independent survey the top 10 loneworker apps are –

📲 StaySafe®
📲 Ok Alone
📲 SafetyLine Lone Worker
📲 SoloProtect UK
📲 Peoplesafe
📲 Skyguard Ltd
📲 Blackline Safety
📲 Guardian24 Ltd
📲 LONEALERT
📲 SHEQSY by SafetyCulture

Do you have a poll you would like us to run and promote for you? Get in touch with us.

Image courtesy of the HSE

A company and its director have been fined following an incident in which an employee was struck by an object while manufacturing large steel cable drums for the offshore industry.

The man, now 54, was employed by Code-A-Weld (Great Yarmouth) Ltd when the incident occurred on 19 November 2022. Although the company had manufactured steel drums previously, they had never produced drums of this size, each weighing in excess of seven tonnes.

The steel drum, weighing more than seven tonnes. 

During the process, the jacking set-up failed at the company’s site in Harfreys Industrial Estate, Great Yarmouth. This failure resulted in a series of serious injuries, including fractures to the man’s face and skull, and the loss of sight in one eye.

The injured man was airlifted to hospital, placed in an induced coma, and spent just under three weeks in hospital, where he required facial reconstruction surgery.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that Code-A-Weld (Great Yarmouth) Ltd failed to conduct a suitable and sufficient risk assessment, control risks associated with welding in confined spaces, and provide the necessary training.

Furthermore, the regulator found that company director David Fowler failed to implement safe systems of work for metal fabrication, despite previous HSE interventions regarding the lack of risk assessments in the fabrication workshop.

Employers Have “Responsibility to Devise Safe Methods of Working” The HSE stated that had the company implemented appropriate measures, such as a suitable risk assessment, safe systems of work, and proper planning for jacking activities, the incident could have been avoided.

Following a sentencing hearing at Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court on 20 June 2024, DJ Williams issued their written judgement on 5 July:

  • Code-A-Weld (Great Yarmouth) Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The company was fined £24,000 and ordered to pay £3,500 in costs.
  • David Fowler, of Harfreys Industrial Estate, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 37(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. He was fined £2,000 and ordered to pay £1,500 in costs.

HSE Inspector Natalie Prince commented: “Those in control of work have a responsibility to devise safe methods of working and to provide the necessary information, instruction, and training to their workers in the safe system of working.

“If a suitable safe system of work had been in place prior to the incident, the life-threatening injuries sustained by the employee could have been prevented.”

About HSE People

HSE People is an online network of professionals who work within Health and Safety, the Environment and Sustainability and Risk and Compliance. We provide our members with free resources such as our career portal, events calendar, industry news, access to whitepapers, eBooks and webinars as well as information about products and services. The aim of HSE People is to support those who Protect People, Places and the Planet.

If you are a blogger or there is a subject you would like to write some content on please get in touch with us so we can share your thoughts and experience with your fellow professionals across our websites and social media platforms

About Hsepeople

Latest Jobs

NEED MORE INFO?

Send us a message